0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

recentactivity

  • All
  • Submitted
  • Corrected
  • Explanations
  • Meanings
- 0
Meaning
Well yea, part of the reason I posted that ridiculously long blob, was cause it was my opinion. And the part about "not supported facts" um. Yea I have no basis of any fact what so ever, that is to say I guess free will is an opinion, um maybe nature really did anticipate humanities s*w ups, uh G doesn't exist. This is crap I pulled off my head and out of my a*. So throughout that whole blob I knew for a "fact" it was all my opinion. So when you said I was giving all as an opinion when I stated keep your opinions to yourself, yea I made myself look like a dumbass but I don't recall saying I was smart and I don't recall saying read me for I am right. I'm an average joe with an extremely confused open mind. So the next time you want to correct my circular reasoning mmm don't bother. Itll just make me more confused than I should be.
- 0
Meaning
Maybe I should of stated "hey i have an opinion but im not giving one cause i dont want people to know what i think" or maybe I should of said "keep your opinions to yourself during retaliation" iono, I will admit I suck at english and that yea this right here is me contradicting myself. Ok you got me. But it is nice to know that you read my text and chose to argue something even more off topic from the original, congrats.
- -1
Meaning
Ok ok, shutup already. So the fact that Katy Perry made this song and also stated she is a Christian is a contradiction. It doesn't matter if the lyrics states and/or interpretes that she is drunk, having a fun time, just experimenting and not being serious; Perry should already know the consequences of making this song. End of that, now to the part of where the topics just crashes and burns. Yes, Biblically homosexuality is wrong. There was not a point where the later books stated anything else new or changing of that topic. It does not work with the nature of the world and/or anywhere else. However, with the "miracle" of science (that's a oxymoron statement) crazy things can happen. Cloning, splicing, stem cell research, and all whatever else are some rediculous unhumane sh-t that is out there. But the thing is, whatcha gonna do? Use your human rights to fight the evils of the world? Uhhh no. But there is one thing that differs us from what nature "intended", a free will. We are all are able to decide what we choose to do. The whole reasoning of right and wrong was created by us. Nature never said "hey, you f--ked up, get it right" no, we only say that to each other. So if someone has an opinion differing from yours, deal with it. You're not gonna be able to change what they choose to believe. Please, please! Don't ever bring religion into an argument, cause even if everyone shares the same main belief, that does not mean everyone shares what follows after it. You can be really casual "pray to G and ask for forgiveness, and Im golden" or the extremest like the 'The Westbrough Baptist Church' who says God damn all Amercans. It doesn't matter who you are, it all still falls under what your opinion is. So unless one of you are reincarnated from death and says that G hates fags and anyone else who don't go against them are not going to heaven, then maybe i'll think about it but otherwise I will still be who I chose to be. Inyourface, you threw me off a little when you stated "The process which you speak of is not natural and does not occur outside of freak show science experiments. So my response to this is that it is not natural and therefore invalid as an argument point." at the beginning and "P.S I sure I mentioned this the first time I commented. I don't like basing arguments on the premise of religious ideology. I prefer science." Now with my overly open-minded 10% used brain, that somewhat contradicted itself or maybe you were trying to say [natural] science. But I would rather not have you state this in your possible next comment cause I'd rather not waste your time or mine on that. Earlier, when I stated that nature wasnt "anticipating" our free-will, aside from choices it also means emotions and personality. You're not going to see a dog wishing its nails were shorter or a bear worrying its eyelashes are too long. Its all just human perception. Homosexuality is not just s*. Sooo many people, when anyone brings up the idea of homosexuality their mind would go straight to the gutter. Get it right, if you can't find the one true love of the opposite s*, shot down, or just can't get anything right-who else would know that pain other than someone of the same s* who experienced the same trials. I'm not g*, I don't see myself in love with a guy, but if my only foundation is him, I'm not letting go. Now if someone out there who would be able to choose to take that step into same s* relationships, then have at it. If they can comfort you more than anyone else then why can't you? Cause in nature its wrong? Cause it's genetically impossible? You can't say an emotion is wrong or right. Science can't cay anything aside from "an emotion is just chemicals bouncing into each other in your brain" yea that helps, and nature can't do jack cause our emotions drive the world we live in. If it wasnt for the creation of humanity, nature would drive it. What was learned from this? Keep your opinions to yourselves, if there was one thing I want you to get out of this it would be "breathe in, let it sit, breathe out, and let it go" P. S. If what I just typed was confusing, off-topic, or just wierd; breathe in, let it sit, breathe out, and let it go.
  • Rank
    8898
  • Karma
    15
  • Points to next rank
    2
  • Submitted
    0
  • Corrected
    0
  • Explanations
    0
  • Meanings
    3