Brandilover is exactly right. The songs you are so g* and I kissed a girl are two of her most sold on itunes. Those two exceed the popularity of her other tracks by far. They are profiting from low class controversy and perpetuating it with the friction created by groups on both sides of the taboo opinion. I learned that in business school. If you ask me about the song itself and not all the other B. S its just a pop version and idea stoled from Jill Sobules - I Kissed A Girl. The lyrics are different but aren't to different.

Sciencenerd,. I believe if it did occur that it is a mutation or genetic accident. If one studies the biological functions of the body they will notice that not only does the desires in mind for the same s* (be it chemical, neurological or whatever) contradict its functions but it also strays from norm that we can use as a standard. A standard to measure wether or not the psyche runs congruent with the innate biological functions of the body. It might be of interest to know that there has been a surge in the homosexuality. And that men have by far have experimented with same s* more then women. Some believe it to be in a certain gene pool and or limited gene pool. There for spreading the gene. But personally believe that its more of a dietary factor that creates high levels of estrogen in men. This may sound absurd but if one looks on the back almost every prepackaged or processed food box that there is an ingredient know as soy lecithin or soy oil. Studies have proven that soy increases the amount of estrogen in men. Just to show how vital it is to be properly balanced chemically; if a man looses his testicles (the producer of testosterone) not only will he lose the strength that his gender is know for but also his facial hair, male voice and desire for females. Contrary to popular belief. Soy has been proven to have more then one harmful effect. Soy used to be used to make boxes. We have our glorious fda to thank for that. Think the fda protects us? Well I state a fact that might make you think otherwise. The fda said its safe to purify our water with chlorine. A little history lesson. Chlorine was the used to make a gas called bertholite or chlorine gas. That gas and method of warfare was banned in most of the worlds developed countries because of the effects it had on men. Even Hitler didn't use it in warfare because he thought it was evil. That's bad because he is said to be the most evil man to have ever lived. Well, I hope that answers your question sciencenerd. Sorry, it took so long but I have preoccupied.

Luvduv, Ok so science has once again gone against nature. Soon You'll be saying its ok to splice monkeys with human babies. The process which you speak of is not natural and does not occur outside of freak show science experiments. So my response to this is that it is not natural and therefore invalid as an argument point. Now for the(*as well as the fact that in any given pairing of genes, anomolies causing gender confusion has been documented, especially in the cases of cross gendered persons, (one being with both a male and female reproductive system, both fully functioning.) and transgendered persons (male born with all the right parts but with a brain chemically functioning as a female and vice versa) part. I said that being g* can be only two of three things, wrong and in the medium. Being a transgendered person and a chemically imbalanced person definitely falls in the medium they are not right nor wrong. My hats off to you on using Christianity to defend gays. Bold but not exactly aiding in your argument. The whole point of the passages below are to teach people to fight against a sinful nature. Meaning one who lives a life like that and does not try to change live according to the law is not forgiven. That's the idea of forgiveness. I am a little annoyed that I actually had to explain that. So on that note your argument is invalid because one you audaciously became G-d and said "if these words hold to be true then "sinners" every where will not even end up in heavan any way and wont ruin your precious sacred space". Which makes you judge and not G-d. And two you literally misinterpreted the passages. I want to thank you for your respect luvduv. But I am also doing fine on my own path to enlightenment. And yes I am frustrated that people can go rewrite religion in favor of themselves and clam to be right when they are wrong. I don't need proof that most of the major religions do not sanction same s* relationships because its common knowledge and if you look it up you'll find it true. Also I love diversity I take pride in that I think outside of the box as an nonconformist. I love to experience other cultures. And culture is all the diversity this world needs. Not s* diversity. And with all do respect luduv I stop taking moral and life lessons form Disney sense I left toddler hood. We live in a world that's not warm or nice. That's something learned from teenage hood. For those who wish do debate me further please read carefully because I really do hate going over things twice. As for you molly 3232 I love the part where you stopped debating and just stared cursing and insulting. Because its indicative that your brain went as far as it could go three pages ago. Not as far as I thought I would go. Sigh. Even more of a disappointment. :) Warm thoughts. Inyourface,. P. S I sure I mentioned this the first time I commented. I don't like basing arguments on the premise of religious ideology. I prefer science.

Dear. Molly 3232. Wow brainless dude wanna be! If I hated gays I would just try and revive the inquisition and employ the idea purging the different. I personally would not waste my time on hating such a person. It makes no difference and gains me nothing. And I guess reproduction is just to complex of an idea for you to grasp. So it would appear to you that I am wrong. But clearly you just don't know what hell you are talking about. And about you rewriting the Christian faith; it doesn't work like that. You can't live the life you do and expect someone like you to be forgiven. Because you never change or even feel that what you do is against the Christianity. I am not going to debate this on the grounds of religion. I don't need to. What I said before remains true not matter how bad your simple minded feelings get hurt :( Interesting opinion on questioning ones sexuality. But you are incorrect to think that she doesn't help (push) things more in the other direction. Its simple psychology. Do your research you'll see. Do you even know what education means and or reasoning. If not I'll tell you, "its something functional, intelligent, and healthy brains do". (You do know what a brain is right? And that you have one)? Or do you? I may be judgmental. But there are three things in these universe that are Universal and that is that there are wrong, right and in the medium things. Being g* is usually only one but I believe it can be two. Being g* is wrong and or in the medium. But never right. Found thoughts, inyourface.

Its wrong to give Christians a bad rep. By contradicting her words and actions. I want to make a few points, but first let me say that I don't hate gays. I just don't approve of the life style from a completely intellectual point of view. I mean even if I wanted to take the religious route it is obvious that all the main religions do not sanction such a relationship. Religions like Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Islam and Catholicism. Do you think that there might be a reason for that? Of course not you don't think. Look from an intellectual point of view excluding G-d from this it is not natural for people to be g*. That simple. You might ask where do I get that? Well if nature and or evolution intended for people to be g* then same sexes could reproduce humans. Man and man (or women and woman) can't make children together. Goes against even nature. We are not programed genetically to be together. And that's all I have to say to you simple minded people about that. As for you idiots defending her. Well you are stupid because its obvious that she is insinuating that she finds pleasure from intimacy with her same s*. Meaning; being with girls feels goood. And she advocates that to young (or girls of any age) girls who look to her as a role model. By perpetuating the social taboo of girls being with girls. She opens the mind more to the idea and creates curiosity which might not have been there other wise. Therefore creating unnecessary sexual preference confusion. Where one might ask them self's hmm? Em I g*? Well it feels good so maybe. What feels good isn't always what's right. Crack, heroin, weed, coke, all feel good so maybe that's ok to right? Good G-d I think I've said enough. Anyway I don't think most of you will get this anyway.